Christian science carbon dating Chat with random people free

Rated 3.88/5 based on 825 customer reviews

Scientists at the Lamont-Doherty Geological Laboratory of Columbia University at Palisades, N.

Y., reported today in the British journal Nature that some estimates of age based on carbon analyses were wrong by as much as 3,500 years.

Accurate tree ring records of age are available for a period extending 9,000 years into the past.But what's interesting is as soon as you die and you're not ingesting anymore plants, or breathing from the atmosphere if you are a plant, or fixing from the atmosphere. Once a plant dies, it's no longer taking in carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and turning it into new tissue. And this carbon-14 does this decay at a specific rate. And you say, hey, that bone has one half the carbon-14 of all the living things that you see right now.And then you can use that rate to actually determine how long ago that thing must've died. It would be a pretty reasonable estimate to say, well, that thing must be 5,730 years old.But the tree ring record goes no further, so scientists have sought other indicators of age against which carbon dates can be compared.One such indicator is the uranium-thorium dating method used by the Lamont-Doherty group.

Leave a Reply